Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Postgres on SSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/12/2011 04:24 PM, Vick Khera wrote:
2011/8/10 Ondrej Ivanič<ondrej.ivanic@xxxxxxxxx>:
Ups! Well spotted Tomas! The actual values are:
random_page_cost = 2
seq_page_cost = 1

With the SSD I would set these to the same value of 1.  That's what I do.

That probably makes sense on your RAMSAN. Sequential access on FusionIO drives is at least 3X as fast as completely random though, and worst-case it can be even slower relative to what a sequential scan can deliver. It's not the >50X difference seen on regular drives, but there's an easily measurable gap. I'm not sure if it's that the flash cells deliver stuff faster when you read a sequential series from the same cell of flash, or if it's just that there's less physical IOs happening.

--
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux