On 12/08/2011 17:26, George MacKerron wrote: > Many thanks for the reply, Ray. > > Unfortunately, I don't think this addresses the problem, because I'd > hoped not to have to hard-code the table name into the function. > > The point of the function is that you can pass it any table name > (along with some other parameters) and it returns rows from that > named table. OK, fair enough.... but what exactly are you trying to do that a simple SELECT won't do? Ray. -- Raymond O'Donnell :: Galway :: Ireland rod@xxxxxx -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
