Lincoln Yeoh wrote: > Ten or so years ago MySQL was better than Postgres95, and it would have > been easy to justify using MySQL over Postgres95 (which was really slow > and had a fair number of bugs). But Postgresql is much better than MySQL > now. That's just my opinion of course. Really?!? MySQL development started in '94; and their first internal release was May 95.[1] At that time Postgres's SQL language support was new, but didn't the underlying database already have a half decade of history that surely was more mature than MySQL at the time? I thought the main justification for MySQL back then is that they had better Win95 support (and a quality control philosophy that more matched the old pre-NT windows that favored time-to-market over correctness). [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySQL#cite_note-21 -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
