Gauthier, Dave wrote:
Hi Everyone:
Tomorrow, I will need to present to a group of managers (who know
nothing about DBs) why I chose to use PG over MySQL in a project,
MySQL being the more popular DB choice with other engineers, and
managers fearing things that are “different” (risk). I have a few hard
tecnical reasons (check constraint, deferred constraint checking,
array data type), but I’m looking for a “it’s more reliable” reasons.
Again, the audience is managers. Is there an impartial, 3^rd party
evaluation of the 2 DBs out there that identifies PG as being more
reliable? It might mention things like fewer incidences of corrupt
tables/indexes, fewer deamon crashes, better recovery after system
crashes, etc... ?
let me just say this one word about that.
ORACLE
i think its a pretty safe assumption that Oracle will not be good for MySQL.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
