Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > wespvp@syntegra.com wrote: > have you tried adding a volatile keyword to the > int volatile errno1_set = 0; > int volatile errno2_set = 0; > > I have applied the following patch to CVS head which does a getpid() in > the loop, rather than nothing. That does not cure the bug identified by wespvp. It may make it a little less likely that the compiler will choose to optimize out the loop test, but only adding "volatile" really fixes the problem in a language-standard-compliant way. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
