Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > wespvp@syntegra.com wrote: > > have you tried adding a volatile keyword to the > > int volatile errno1_set = 0; > > int volatile errno2_set = 0; > > > > I have applied the following patch to CVS head which does a getpid() in > > the loop, rather than nothing. > > That does not cure the bug identified by wespvp. It may make it a > little less likely that the compiler will choose to optimize out the > loop test, but only adding "volatile" really fixes the problem in > a language-standard-compliant way. Thanks, 'volatile' added to the thread-specific errno variables: volatile int errno1_set = 0; volatile int errno2_set = 0; -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
