On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Andrea Suisani <sickpig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> sure you're right. >> >> It's just that my bet was on a higher throughput >> when HT was isabled from the BIOS (as you stated >> previously in this thread). > > Yes, mine too. It's bizarre. If I were you, I'd look into it more > deeply. It may be a flaw in your test methodology (maybe you disabled > the wrong cores?). If not, it would be good to know why the extra TPS > to replicate elsewhere. I'd recommend more synthetic benchmarks when trying to compare systems like this. bonnie++, the memory stream test that Greg Smith was working on, and so on. Get an idea what core differences the machines display under such testing. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
