Re: FW: KVP table vs. hstore - hstore performance (Was: Postgres NoSQL emulation)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Merlin

The analyze command gave the following result:

On the KVP table:
Index Scan using kvpidx on bench_kvp (cost=0.00..8.53 rows=1 width=180) (actual time=0.037..0.038 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (bench_id = '200000_200000'::text)
Total runtime: 0.057 ms

And on the Hstore table:
Bitmap Heap Scan on bench_hstore (cost=32.22..3507.54 rows=1000 width=265) (actual time=145.040..256.173 rows=1 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (bench_hstore @> '"bench_id"=>"200000_200000"'::hstore)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on hidx (cost=0.00..31.97 rows=1000 width=0) (actual time=114.748..114.748 rows=30605 loops=1)
Index Cond: (bench_hstore @> '"bench_id"=>"200000_200000"'::hstore)
Total runtime: 256.211 ms

For Hstore I'm using a GIST index.


Try to create a btree index on "(bench_hstore->bench_id) WHERE (bench_hstore->bench_id) IS NOT NULL".


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux