On 23/05/11 12:09, Aren Cambre wrote: > Also, thanks for the advice on batching my queries. I am now using a > very efficient bulk data read and write methods for Postgres. > > My program bulk reads 100,000 rows, processes those rows (during which > it does a few SELECTs), and then writes 100,000 rows at a time. > > It cycles through this until it has processed all 12,000,000 rows. > > This, plus the parallelism fix, will probably convert this 30 hour > program to a <2 hour program. It's always good to hear when these things work out. Thanks for reporting back. Using the set-based nature of relational databases to your advantage, writing smarter queries that do more work server-side with fewer round-trips, and effective batching can make a huge difference. -- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
