On PostgreSQL, the difference in no hints and hints for that one query
with skewed data is that the query finishes a little faster. On some
others, which shall remain nameless, it is the difference between
finishing in seconds or days, or maybe never. Hints can be useful, but
I can also see why they are not a top priority. They are rarely needed,
and only when working around a bug. If you want them so badly, you have
the source, write a contrib module (can you do that on Oracle or
MSSQL?) If I have a choice between the developers spending time on
implementing hints, and spending time on improving the optimiser, I'll
take the optimiser.
Tom Kyte agrees:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:8912905298920
http://tkyte.blogspot.com/2006/08/words-of-wisdom.html
Oracle can be faster on count queries, but that is the only case I have
seen. Generally on most other queries, especially when it involves
complex joins, or indexes on text fields, PostgreSQL is faster on the
same hardware.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
