Re: Thousands of tables versus on table?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/6/07, Craig James <craig_james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They're blowing smoke if they think Oracle can do this.

Oracle could handle this fine.

Oracle fell over dead, even with the best indexing possible,
tuned by the experts, and using partitions keyed to the
customerID.

I don't think so, whoever tuned this likely didn't know what they were doing.

It's telling that Oracle's license contract prohibits you from
publishing comparisons and benchmarks.  You have to wonder why.

They did this for the same reason as everyone else.  They don't want
non-experts tuning the database incorrectly, writing a benchmark paper
about it, and making the software look bad.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation            | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor            | jharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Iselin, New Jersey 08830            | http://www.enterprisedb.com/


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux