After takin a swig o' Arrakan spice grog, jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ("Joshua D. Drake") belched out:
> Jeremy Haile wrote:
>> We are a small company looking to put together the most cost effective
>> solution for our production database environment. Currently in
>> production Postgres 8.1 is running on this machine:
>>
>> Dell 2850
>> 2 x 3.0 Ghz Xeon 800Mhz FSB 2MB Cache
>> 4 GB DDR2 400 Mhz
>> 2 x 73 GB 10K SCSI RAID 1 (for xlog and OS)
>> 4 x 146 GB 10K SCSI RAID 10 (for postgres data)
>> Perc4ei controller
>>
>> The above is a standard Dell box with nothing added or modified beyond
>> the options available directly through Dell.
> You should probably review the archives for PostgreSQL user
> experience with Dell's before you purchase one.
Hear, hear! We found Dell servers were big-time underperformers.
Generic hardware put together with generally the same brand names of
components (e.g. - for SCSI controllers and such) would generally play
much better.
For the cheapo desktop boxes they obviously have to buy the "cheapest
hardware available this week;" it sure seems as though they engage in
the same sort of thing with the "server class" hardware.
I don't think anyone has been able to forcibly point out any
completely precise shortcoming; just that they underperform what the
specs suggest they ought to be able to provide.
>> I sent our scenario to our sales team at Dell and they came back
>> with all manner of SAN, DAS, and configuration costing as much as
>> $50k.
> HAHAHAHAHA.... Don't do that. Dell is making the assumption you
> won't do your homework. Make sure you cross quote with IBM, Compaq
> and Penguin Computing...
Indeed.
--
(format nil "~S@~S" "cbbrowne" "gmail.com")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/rdbms.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #141. "As an alternative to not having
children, I will have _lots_ of children. My sons will be too busy
jockeying for position to ever be a real threat, and the daughters
will all sabotage each other's attempts to win the hero."
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
