Re: transactoin id wraparound problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sriram Dandapani wrote:
> Ihave a 60Gb db on which I issued a vacuumdb -a call as a superuser. It
> as been running for about 20 hours. (All client connections have been
> disabled as well as jobs that access any table). I see 0% cpu
> utilization. The vacuumdb process by itself takes about 10% memory and
> postgres uses very little cpu and some io.(10-20%).
> 
> Is there a way to tell vacuumdb to use more resources so it can run
> faster?

Maybe you have the vacuum cost delay parameters set?  IIRC you should
drop vacuum_cost_delay to 0 if you want it to run as fast as possible.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux