Re: transactoin id wraparound problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ihave a 60Gb db on which I issued a vacuumdb -a call as a superuser. It
as been running for about 20 hours. (All client connections have been
disabled as well as jobs that access any table). I see 0% cpu
utilization. The vacuumdb process by itself takes about 10% memory and
postgres uses very little cpu and some io.(10-20%).

Is there a way to tell vacuumdb to use more resources so it can run
faster?

-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 7:48 PM
To: Sriram Dandapani
Cc: Scott Marlowe; Tom Lane; pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] transactoin id wraparound problem

Sriram Dandapani wrote:
> Hi
> I have several such databases to issue vacuum on. If I were to vacuum
> each table individually, would the transaction id be updated after
every
> table vacuum.

No, you must issue database-wide vacuums.  Single-table vacuums, even if
done to each and every table, do not suffice.

> Wonder if it is because I have several large partitioned tables that I
> drop every day that don't get vacuumed enough.

The best time of the day to do the vacuum would be just after one such
partition was dropped, one would think.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera
http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux