On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 7:09 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 11:55:00AM +0800, zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Rewrite Quick Quiz 3.6 for clarity and explicitness, so that the
> > firsttime reader know that another choice is CPU 0 sharing a core
> > with CPU 1.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou<zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > hi Paul and Akira
> >
> > This minor fix is also reported by our Chinese version editor
> > Yunjing Li.
>
> I have pulled this in, thanks to both you and the editor! Would it be
> appropriate to have the editor's reported-by? (I trust your judgment
> on this. I am only asking, not in any way suggesting a change.)
I think I should have the editor's report-by, but she is too modest to
offer her email-address,
because she thinks this is her job.
Could we add reported-by without an email address ? ;-)
Thanx, Zhouyi
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Thanks
> > Zhouyi
> > --
> > cpu/overheads.tex | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/cpu/overheads.tex b/cpu/overheads.tex
> > index 1ee9c52f..a2ec2998 100644
> > --- a/cpu/overheads.tex
> > +++ b/cpu/overheads.tex
> > @@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ CAS and lock, respectively.
> > \QuickQuiz{
> > \Cref{tab:cpu:CPU 0 View of Synchronization Mechanisms on 8-Socket System With Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 CPUs at 2.10GHz}
> > shows CPU~0 sharing a core with CPU~224.
> > - Shouldn't that instead be CPU~1???
> > + However, isn't it more logical for CPU 0
> > + to share a core with CPU 1 instead of CPU 224???
> > }\QuickQuizAnswer{
> > It is easy to be sympathetic to this view, but the file
> > \path{/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index0/shared_cpu_list}
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
