On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 11:55:00AM +0800, zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Rewrite Quick Quiz 3.6 for clarity and explicitness, so that the
> firsttime reader know that another choice is CPU 0 sharing a core
> with CPU 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou<zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> hi Paul and Akira
>
> This minor fix is also reported by our Chinese version editor
> Yunjing Li.
I have pulled this in, thanks to both you and the editor! Would it be
appropriate to have the editor's reported-by? (I trust your judgment
on this. I am only asking, not in any way suggesting a change.)
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks
> Zhouyi
> --
> cpu/overheads.tex | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpu/overheads.tex b/cpu/overheads.tex
> index 1ee9c52f..a2ec2998 100644
> --- a/cpu/overheads.tex
> +++ b/cpu/overheads.tex
> @@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ CAS and lock, respectively.
> \QuickQuiz{
> \Cref{tab:cpu:CPU 0 View of Synchronization Mechanisms on 8-Socket System With Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 CPUs at 2.10GHz}
> shows CPU~0 sharing a core with CPU~224.
> - Shouldn't that instead be CPU~1???
> + However, isn't it more logical for CPU 0
> + to share a core with CPU 1 instead of CPU 224???
> }\QuickQuizAnswer{
> It is easy to be sympathetic to this view, but the file
> \path{/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index0/shared_cpu_list}
> --
> 2.34.1
>
