[PATCH -perfbook] cpu: make Quick Quiz 3.6 more explicit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>

Rewrite Quick Quiz 3.6 for clarity and explicitness, so that the
firsttime reader know that another choice is CPU 0 sharing a core
with CPU 1.

Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou<zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
---
hi Paul and Akira

This minor fix is also reported by our Chinese version editor
Yunjing Li.

Thanks
Zhouyi
--
 cpu/overheads.tex | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/cpu/overheads.tex b/cpu/overheads.tex
index 1ee9c52f..a2ec2998 100644
--- a/cpu/overheads.tex
+++ b/cpu/overheads.tex
@@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ CAS and lock, respectively.
 \QuickQuiz{
 	\Cref{tab:cpu:CPU 0 View of Synchronization Mechanisms on 8-Socket System With Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 CPUs at 2.10GHz}
 	shows CPU~0 sharing a core with CPU~224.
-	Shouldn't that instead be CPU~1???
+	However, isn't it more logical for CPU 0
+	to share a core with CPU 1 instead of CPU 224???
 }\QuickQuizAnswer{
 	It is easy to be sympathetic to this view, but the file
 	\path{/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index0/shared_cpu_list}
-- 
2.34.1





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux