Re: Question: Are there conflicts between the paragraph and the figure?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 12:31:05PM +0800, Alan Huang wrote:
> 
> 
> > 2023年5月3日 01:28,Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> 写道:
> > 
> > On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 11:51:33PM +0800, Alan Huang wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> 2023年5月2日 03:02,Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> 写道:
> >>> 
> >>> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 07:09:49PM +0800, Alan Huang wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> 2023年5月1日 下午7:05,Alan Huang <mmpgouride@xxxxxxxxx> 写道:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I’m reading section 9.5.4.9, in the second to the last paragraph, there is:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Before the first horizontal line, all readers see the leftmost myconfig structure,
> >>>>> and after the second horizontal line, all readers will see the rightmost structure. 
> >>>>> Between the two lines, that is, during the grace period, different readers might see different objects
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I’m a little confused, in Figure 9.29, the xchg is before the first horizontal line, in my understanding, if the 
> >>>>> reader’s reading is before the xchg, it will read the leftmost myconfg structure.
> >>>> 
> >>>> And if reader’s reading is after the xchg, it will see the rightmost structure, and because xchg is before the first horizontal line,
> >>>> Readers before the first horizontal line may also see the rightmost structure.
> >>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> So, are there some conflicts between the paragraph and the figure?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Please correct me if I’m wrong.
> >>> 
> >>> Consider the point in time just before the left-hand reader's
> >>> rcu_read_unlock() and just after the right-hand reader's rcu_read_lock().
> >>> These two readers are both running at that time, and one of those readers
> >>> sees the old state and the other sees the new state.
> >> 
> >> The sentence that may lead to conflict is this one from the original text:
> >> 
> >> Before the first horizontal line, all readers see the leftmost myconfig structure.
> >> 
> >> There may be a situation where:
> >> 
> >>        mcp = xchg(&curconfig, mcp);
> >> rcu_read_lock(); 
> >> mcp = …
> >> *cur_a = mcp->a; 
> >> -------------------------------------------------first horizontal line-------------------------------------------------
> >> 
> >> So, the reader will see the rightmost myconfig structure although it is before the first horizontal line.
> > 
> > Ah, I understand now, good catch and thank you!  I updated that paragraph
> > to the following, with your Reported-by:
> > 
> > The two horizontal grey dashed lines represent the period of time
> > during which different readers get different results, however,
> > each reader will see one and only one of the two objects. All
> > readers that end before the first horizontal line will see the
> 
> 
> How about this:
> 
>         				mcp = xchg(&curconfig, mcp);
> 	rcu_read_lock(); 
> 	mcp = …
> 	*cur_a = mcp->a; 
> 	rcu_read_unlock();
> -------------------------------------------------first horizontal line-------------------------------------------------
> 
> The reader above end before the first horizontal line, but still get the rightmost myconfig structure.
> 
> The point is that there is a time period between xchg and the first horizontal line during which a reader
> will see the rightmost myconfig structure. 
> 
> One possible solution is to move xchg behind the first horizontal line, assuming that I understand correctly.

Yes, it would in some sense be more accurate to run that horizontal line
right through the "mcp = xchg(&curconfig, mcp);".

But can you do that so that the diagram looks OK and is legible?

							Thanx, Paul

> > leftmost myconfig structure, and all readers that start after the
> > second horizontal line will see the rightmost structure. Between
> > the two lines, that is, during the grace period, different readers
> > might see different objects, but as long as each reader loads the
> > curconfig pointer only once, each reader will see a consistent
> > view of its myconfig structure.
> > 
> > Does that help?
> > 
> >> BTW, the original text says that black dotted arrows pointing from an older event to a newer event, 
> >> but there exists two black dotted arrows in the wrong direction:
> >> 
> >> 1.The arrow pointing from synchronize_rcu() to left-hand rcu_read_lock()
> >> 2.The arrow pointing right-hand rcu_read_lock() to synchronize_rcu() 
> >> 
> >> The directions of the two arrows above may need to be adjusted. I tried to modify this, but after a few hours, I still can’t figure out the svg...
> > 
> > The trick is to use an SVG editor.  For better or for worse, I use
> > inkscape.  But easy for me to change, so I did, again, with your
> > Reported-by.
> > 
> > The trick is to flip each arrow horizontally and then vertically, which
> > reverses the direction without having to test one's manual dexterity,
> > which I lack in abundance.  ;-)
> 
> 
> Thanks for the tricks, will try to use it!
> 
> Thanks,
> Alan
> 
> > 
> > Thanx, Paul
> > 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Alan
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Does that help, or am I missing the point of your question?
> >>> 
> >>> Thanx, Paul
> 
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux