On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:01:57PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 10:21:28 -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > A sectence in 'Microbenchmarking' section is mentioning the remainder of
> > the section will look at ways for dealing with conflicts in measurement
> > error advices, but those are not dealt in the remainder of the section
> > but its following sections. Fix the sentence.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > debugging/debugging.tex | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/debugging/debugging.tex b/debugging/debugging.tex
> > index 53c7fb94..225a4184 100644
> > --- a/debugging/debugging.tex
> > +++ b/debugging/debugging.tex
> > @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ to creep in, including:
> >
> > The first and fourth sources of interference provide conflicting advice,
> > which is one sign that we are living in the real world.
> > -The remainder of this section looks at ways of resolving this conflict.
> > +The following sections look at ways of resolving this conflict.
>
> If you interpret "The remainder of this section" as "The remainder of
> Section 11.6.4 'Hunting Heisenbugs'", there is nothing to fix.
>
> We call all of section, subsection, and subsubsection as "Section",
> which might be confusing sometimes, but I don't have any idea what
> should be done here.
One approach would be to say something like this:
The remainder of this section (Section 11.6.4) looks at ways of
resolving this conflict.
I am not sure whether or not this is a good idea, but perhaps either
way it will inspire better ideas.
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks, Akira
>
> >
> > \QuickQuiz{
> > But what about other sources of error, for example, due to
