Hi Paul,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 09:33:44 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:01:57PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 10:21:28 -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > A sectence in 'Microbenchmarking' section is mentioning the remainder of
> > > the section will look at ways for dealing with conflicts in measurement
> > > error advices, but those are not dealt in the remainder of the section
> > > but its following sections. Fix the sentence.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > debugging/debugging.tex | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/debugging/debugging.tex b/debugging/debugging.tex
> > > index 53c7fb94..225a4184 100644
> > > --- a/debugging/debugging.tex
> > > +++ b/debugging/debugging.tex
> > > @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ to creep in, including:
> > >
> > > The first and fourth sources of interference provide conflicting advice,
> > > which is one sign that we are living in the real world.
> > > -The remainder of this section looks at ways of resolving this conflict.
> > > +The following sections look at ways of resolving this conflict.
> >
> > If you interpret "The remainder of this section" as "The remainder of
> > Section 11.6.4 'Hunting Heisenbugs'", there is nothing to fix.
> >
> > We call all of section, subsection, and subsubsection as "Section",
> > which might be confusing sometimes, but I don't have any idea what
> > should be done here.
>
> One approach would be to say something like this:
>
> The remainder of this section (Section 11.6.4) looks at ways of
> resolving this conflict.
>
> I am not sure whether or not this is a good idea, but perhaps either
> way it will inspire better ideas.
Thank you for nice suggestion. Will follow your idea in the next spin.
Thanks,
SJ
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Thanks, Akira
> >
> > >
> > > \QuickQuiz{
> > > But what about other sources of error, for example, due to
