Re: [PATCH 5/5] debugging/debugging: s/remainder of a section/following sections/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun,  5 Feb 2023 10:21:28 -0800, SeongJae Park wrote:
> From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> A sectence in 'Microbenchmarking' section is mentioning the remainder of
> the section will look at ways for dealing with conflicts in measurement
> error advices, but those are not dealt in the remainder of the section
> but its following sections.  Fix the sentence.
> 
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  debugging/debugging.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/debugging/debugging.tex b/debugging/debugging.tex
> index 53c7fb94..225a4184 100644
> --- a/debugging/debugging.tex
> +++ b/debugging/debugging.tex
> @@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ to creep in, including:
>  
>  The first and fourth sources of interference provide conflicting advice,
>  which is one sign that we are living in the real world.
> -The remainder of this section looks at ways of resolving this conflict.
> +The following sections look at ways of resolving this conflict.

If you interpret "The remainder of this section" as "The remainder of
Section 11.6.4 'Hunting Heisenbugs'", there is nothing to fix.

We call all of section, subsection, and subsubsection as "Section",
which might be confusing sometimes, but I don't have any idea what
should be done here.

        Thanks, Akira

>  
>  \QuickQuiz{
>  	But what about other sources of error, for example, due to



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux