Re: POSIX Proess Creation and Destruction nit-picking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Akira,

The patch looks fine, but is indeed unrelated to my comments.

--Elad

On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 19:00, Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 01:19:25 +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > Hello Elad,
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:23:20 -0400, Elad Lahav wrote:
> >> The following issues may not be deemed important enough to fix, but
> >> I'll point them out nevertheless:
> >>
> > [...]
> >> - Listing 4.2 could have just used waitpid() instead of the loop.
> >
> > Listing 4.2 shows our implementation of waitall() function used under
> > CodeSamples/ directory of perfbook's repository.
> > Your feedback prompted me to review the listing and I noticed that
> > the name of the function is missing there.
> >
> > I fixed the position of extraction markers in api-pthreads.h
> >
> > Please find the patch below.
>
> Hi Elad,
>
> I might not be clear enough, but could you let me know if you think
> the patch looks reasonable.  I mean, if you think this change is not
> related to your feed back, I'll drop the Reported-by tag.
>
>         Thanks, Akira
>
> >
> >> If I were really a nit-picking person I would have pointed out the
> >> various places in chapters 2 and 3 where infinitives are being split,
> >> but I'm not so I won't ;-).
> >
> > As far as I am concerned, I like the colloquial tone of perfbook
> > and have no trouble seeing split infinitives as long as they are easy
> > to understand. Just a non-native speaker's opinion.
> >
> >         Thanks, Akira
> >
> >> --Elad
> >>
> >
> > ----------8<------------------
> > From fec0187d2cb12fdf13a8c040c447c37c1bd5e183 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 00:41:02 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH] toolsoftrade: Fix extraction range of waitall()
> >
> > Commit 29d0c7c185f2 ("toolsoftrade: Add labels in code samples as
> > comments") failed to include the function name and the closing brace
> > in the snippet of waitall() extracted from api-pthreads.h.
> >
> > The original snippet removed in commit a62cf8469280 ("toolsoftrade:
> > Reference line in code snippets by label") contained those
> > lines.
> >
> > Restore them by repositioning meta commands in api-pthreads.h
> >
> > Reported-by: Elad Lahav <e2lahav@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 29d0c7c185f2 ("toolsoftrade: Add labels in code samples as comments")
> > Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  CodeSamples/api-pthreads/api-pthreads.h | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/CodeSamples/api-pthreads/api-pthreads.h b/CodeSamples/api-pthreads/api-pthreads.h
> > index f5510f01..5d17a9bd 100644
> > --- a/CodeSamples/api-pthreads/api-pthreads.h
> > +++ b/CodeSamples/api-pthreads/api-pthreads.h
> > @@ -287,9 +287,9 @@ static __inline__ void wait_all_threads(void)
> >  /*
> >   * Wait on all child processes.
> >   */
> > +// \begin{snippet}[labelbase=ln:api-pthreads:api-pthreads:waitall,commandchars=\%\[\]]
> >  static __inline__ void waitall(void)
> >  {
> > -// \begin{snippet}[labelbase=ln:api-pthreads:api-pthreads:waitall,commandchars=\%\[\]]
> >       int pid;
> >       int status;
> >
> > @@ -303,8 +303,8 @@ static __inline__ void waitall(void)
> >               }
> >               poll(NULL, 0, 1);               //\fcvexclude
> >       }                                       //\lnlbl{loopb}
> > -// \end{snippet}
> >  }
> > +// \end{snippet}
> >
> >  static __inline__ void run_on(int cpu)
> >  {
> >
>



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux