Andrew Morgan wrote: > > I think I'd like to see an autoconf test for this, and something to > ensure that any module that uses it can fall back to the non _r function > if its not available at compile time. > Agreed. > I'd also draw your attention to this: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/pam_appl-4.html#ss4.1 > Yes, I am aware of this. However, as I am dealing with several applications that may suffer from this problem, and I have had some difficulty contacting maintainers, I would prefer to solve it in fewer patches if possible. Regards, Chris