Re: PAM behavior question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yup, that worked like a charm, thanks!

Adam Slattery wrote:

> > The idea is to use optional modules
> > and accept the first one that works in order.
>
> What you want is the "sufficient" keyword. This is already implemented.
>
> - Adam Slattery
>
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Pam-list@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pam-list

--
Corey Kovacs               "I know not with what weapons World War III
Computer Science Dept.      will be fought, but World War IV will be
DePauw University.          fought with sticks and stones."
765.658.4761                            - Albert Einstein






[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux for the blind]     [Gimp]

  Powered by Linux