Frank Cusack wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 03:11:01PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Have you talked to Frank about including your fixes in his next release? > > (I've been cc:ing him on this thread because it's relevant to making his > > module work under Linux, but I have no idea if he's reading. :) I agree with > > your assessment that Frank's pam_krb5 module is the most > > functionally-complete implementation available to date, which is a good reason > > to prevent code forking here if possible... > > I am reading. :) > > I have been out of town for the past week, and caught a cold while away, > so I haven't been able to concentrate hard enough to really *read* this > thread. I think the only point I would raise is that the conv() argument > should in fact be an array of pointers; ie Solaris is correct. I Careful, did you mean something else? With the words you are using, you are describing the Linux implementation as correct and not the Solaris one. > have a thread saved from comp.lang.c which might support my argument. > It'll be a few days until I'm seeing straight enough to put my thoughts > together. (and at this point, I may just be taking a defensive posture > against you bullies. :)) > > Perhaps this is a good time to make this module more accessible, ie > using sourceforge or something. [I'd be very happy to give you developer access the the PAM site for this.] Cheers Andrew
