On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 03:11:01PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > Have you talked to Frank about including your fixes in his next release? > (I've been cc:ing him on this thread because it's relevant to making his > module work under Linux, but I have no idea if he's reading. :) I agree with > your assessment that Frank's pam_krb5 module is the most > functionally-complete implementation available to date, which is a good reason > to prevent code forking here if possible... I am reading. :) I have been out of town for the past week, and caught a cold while away, so I haven't been able to concentrate hard enough to really *read* this thread. I think the only point I would raise is that the conv() argument should in fact be an array of pointers; ie Solaris is correct. I have a thread saved from comp.lang.c which might support my argument. It'll be a few days until I'm seeing straight enough to put my thoughts together. (and at this point, I may just be taking a defensive posture against you bullies. :)) Perhaps this is a good time to make this module more accessible, ie using sourceforge or something. ~f
