Re: Reviewer Registration/Profiles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It is helpful to know these goals in order to suggest improvements.

With respect to data gathering to assess the quality of participation,
I suggest just gathering simple data at registration time, plus a 
retrospective data gathering exercise of the top N reviewers
at the end of the study.

To build community, may I suggest the "business card" metaphor; 
a minimal amount of information, but enough to roughly position 
a contact in terms of professional qualifications and to provide a basis 
for identification and follow-up research, if need be.

For example, here's my business card info:
Robert D. Cameron, Ph.D.
Professor, School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University
President, International Characters, Inc.
http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~cameron/

So, for education, simply ask for the highest academic credential.
"Please choose your highest academic credential from the drop
down list or enter in the text box."   

For those who self-identify, I suspect that more than 75% would
list their highest credential.     On the other hand, if you ask for
a list of credentials giving year, institution and field of study,
I suspect you may have less than 25% of reviewers providing
this info.

As for "publications, grants, awards, memberships", I would
be surprised to see even 5% of reviewers providing this data.

On April 10, 2007 06:06 pm, Beth Noveck wrote:
> Thanks for this helpful feedback.  It definitely doesn't look "right"
> yet.  Work in progress.  I appreciate the suggestion of more
> programmer-centric lingo.
>
> We could just go with an open-ended approach of letting people tag
> themselves with whatever info they choose.  But we want to build
> community through more information about who's participating and
> gather data to prove the point that open participation can work and
> can attract expertise.
>
> Since this is a site about generating, not just any information but
> the right information, and identifying specialists on very narrow
> topics, it's important to get people to self-identify clearly.  Hence
> we want to encourage without forcing people to tell about themselves,
> if they wish.
>
> Also - I anticipate that some people want to participate here in
> order to get noticed and get hired by the inventors.  Hence they may
> want to "brag."
>
> Will keep working on this.  Suggestions always welcome.
>
> Beth
>
> On Apr 9, 2007, at 5:36 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On 4/7/07, Rob Cameron <cameron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> I think it is too simplistic to have a single "professional role".
> >> People may have different roles with different affiliations.
> >>
> >> I think the personal profile is asking for too much information,
> >> and the wrong kind.   It looks like academic CV style information.
> >> In particular, the "publications, grants, awards, memberships"
> >> info is overboard.
> >>
> >> Open source developers won't be welcomed by the focus
> >> on things like grants and awards; they will want to be recognized
> >> for their open source projects and their roles within those projects.
> >> Isn't there a goal to encourage participation by open source
> >> developers?
> >
> > Second all this.
> >
> > I might also suggest replacing 'Professional Role' with something like
> > 'Relevant Expertise', which might be information about a relevant
> > profession, but might be about other non-professional expertise.
> >
> > More generally, this is a lot of information- my eyes glazed over
> > about half-way through. Unless you've got a particular plan to utilize
> > all this information in a way which requires it to be structured, I'd
> > recommend asking for no more than a biography  paragraph- 'this is who
> > I am; this is why I have relevant skills'. (You may have such a plan
> > in which case I retract these comments until I hear what the plan is
> > ;)
> >
> > Luis (Beth, I'll try to write in the other thread tomorrow.)
> > _______________________________________________
> > p2patent-developer mailing list
> > p2patent-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/p2patent-developer

-- 
Robert D. Cameron, Ph.D.
Professor of Computing Science
Simon Fraser University

_______________________________________________
p2patent-developer mailing list
p2patent-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/p2patent-developer


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux