Re: an oldie but a goodie .. ISO C90 does not support 'long long'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Wojcik wrote in
 <DM6PR18MB2700A79998E1505EB822C0B3F9399@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\
 ook.com>:
 |> From: openssl-users <openssl-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf \
 |> Of Phillip
 |> Susi
 |> Sent: Wednesday, 2 November, 2022 11:45
 |> 
 |> The only thing to fix is don't put your compiler in strict C90 mode.
 |
 |I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward compatibil\
 |ity, C99 was standardized nearly a quarter of a century ago. OpenSSL \
 |1.x is younger than C99. It doesn't seem like an unreasonable requirement.

Or use __extension__, which definetely worked by then.

 |But as Tomas wrote, anyone who thinks it is can submit a pull request.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux