Re: an oldie but a goodie .. ISO C90 does not support 'long long'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dennis Clarke via openssl-users <openssl-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 11/2/22 07:30, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>> No, long long and unsigned long long is required and it was required
>> for quite some time. The code is mostly C90 but not strictly.
>> I suppose on platforms with 64bit long type we could make it work
>> without long long though. Pull requests are welcome.
>> Tomas Mraz, OpenSSL
>> 
>
>     So fix it?

The only thing to fix is don't put your compiler in strict C90 mode.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux