On 11/2/22 07:30, Tomas Mraz wrote:
No, long long and unsigned long long is required and it was required
for quite some time. The code is mostly C90 but not strictly.
I suppose on platforms with 64bit long type we could make it work
without long long though. Pull requests are welcome.
Tomas Mraz, OpenSSL
So fix it?
Feels like we are just going around and around in circles here :
Strict C90 CFLAGS results in sha.h:91 ISO C90 does not support long long
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/10547
OPENSSL_strnlen SIGSEGV in o_str.c line 76
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/8048
So the code is *mostly* C90 but not really. Got it.
Certainly worth looking at.
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional
