Re: OpenSSL 1.1 on OSX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Which is indeed what I do in our notarized MacOsX and iOS applications.  However to do so, I have historically needed to clean up OpenSSL source code to actually behave as a proper static library where only used functions are linked in.  Most notably, the source files named xxx_lib.c tend to cause the opposite behavior by bundling used and unused code into a single .o file, so I had to do thematic splitting of those source files, to not only avoid the unused functions getting linked in, but also the unused .o files referenced by those unused functions.  This problem is fully cross platform, although some more detail work had to be done to ensure compatibility of certain source files with XCode bundled tool chains (In particular the optimized assembler files).

On 2021-11-20 07:47, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
An alternative would be to statically link libssl and libcrypto.  No more dependencies.


Pauli

On 20/11/21 3:48 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 01:38:39PM +1100, Grahame Grieve wrote:

I agree it's sure not a core openSSL issue. But surely lots of people
want to use openSSL in cross platform apps and openSSL is interested
in adoption issues?
Most of the users here are building applications that are not notarised,
and so work with the upstream builds.

Anyway, it looks like I now have to figure out how to maintain a
custom build of openSSL :-(
It shouldn't be too difficult to execute the build, once you've figured
out the actual requirements.  Apparently you need to make sure that
signed code has very explicit dependencies, which makes some sense, so
the libraries bundled with the application need to be built in a way
that can be verified along with the application.

My best guess is that Apple are not specifically picking on OpenSSL
here, and similar issues would arise with any other libraries you'd
want to package with your application.  Good luck.

Feel free to share your findings.  Perhaps someone will then help
you find a way to improve on them, or to add a template to the
build to support this going forward...


Enjoy

Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S.  https://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark.  Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux