> My question was meant to ask why the pointers are initialized with > memset() instead of initializing them by an assignment with NULL or 0. > Was this a deliberate decision for some reason, or did it just creep in and no > one cares now to fix it? Would the OpenSSL team accept pull requests that > fix this? It was a mix of what was done, and then a conscious decision to do things that way. As for the PR, well, maybe... We'd need to know details of which machine "test/sanitytest.c" fails on, and how popular it is to see if it's worthwhile. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
