> > OpenSSL does not support platforms where the memory representation of > > the NULL pointer contains non-zero bytes. IIRC there are even tests for > this. > > Could someone from the OpenSSL team please explain the rationale for this > decision? What is the problem with using assignments with 0 or NULL to > initialize pointers? I think you are confused. There is no problem with what you posted. The issue is that if NULL != 0, OpenSSL won't necessarily work. See test/sanitytest.c for what we check. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users