> > As there is no documentation and as noone seems to know the meaning of > > the -no_explicit for "openssl ocsp", should I file a documentation > > defect in RT for that? > > yes, please. Never mind, Stephen already fixed the doc in master :)
> > As there is no documentation and as noone seems to know the meaning of > > the -no_explicit for "openssl ocsp", should I file a documentation > > defect in RT for that? > > yes, please. Never mind, Stephen already fixed the doc in master :)