Meaning of OCSP_NOEXPLICIT for OCSP_basic_verify()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Meaning of OCSP_NOEXPLICIT for OCSP_basic_verify()
From: rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx (Salz, Rich)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:02:34 +0000
In-reply-to: <54EC37D9.7080900@pdflib.com>
References: <54E4836F.6010406@pdflib.com> <54EC37D9.7080900@pdflib.com>

> As there is no documentation and as noone seems to know the meaning of
> the -no_explicit for "openssl ocsp", should I file a documentation defect in RT
> for that?

yes, please.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Meaning of OCSP_NOEXPLICIT for OCSP_basic_verify()
  - From: Salz, Rich

References:
- Meaning of OCSP_NOEXPLICIT for OCSP_basic_verify()
  - From: Stephan Mühlstrasser
- Meaning of OCSP_NOEXPLICIT for OCSP_basic_verify()
  - From: Stephan Mühlstrasser

Prev by Date: fips_ecdhvs failing for non Prime Curves
Next by Date: CMS questions
Previous by thread: Meaning of OCSP_NOEXPLICIT for OCSP_basic_verify()
Next by thread: Meaning of OCSP_NOEXPLICIT for OCSP_basic_verify()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux