Meaning of OCSP_NOEXPLICIT for OCSP_basic_verify()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 24.02.15 um 14:47 schrieb Dr. Stephen Henson:

> If the responder root CA is set to be trusted for OCSP signing then it can be
> used to sign OCSP responses for any certificate (aka a global responder). This
> comes under:
>
>     1. Matches a local configuration of OCSP signing authority for the
>     certificate in question
>
> or alternatively:
>
>     Additional acceptance or rejection criteria may apply to either the
>     response itself or to the certificate used to validate the signature
>     on the response.
>
> from RFC2560 et al.
>
> If the -no_explicit flag is set or OCSP_NOEXPLICIT is set then this behaviour
> is disabled.
>

Do I understand it correctly then that "a local configuration of OCSP 
signing authority" here means that it is a deliberate choice inside 
OpenSSL itself to look for the OCSPSigning flag in the extended key 
usage of the root CA, although RFC 2560 does not say so?

-- 
Stephan


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux