David Newall wrote: > On 02/01/18 03:29, Michael Ströder wrote: >> How high is the risk that this unmaintained device is added to >> yet-another-bot-net in the Internet-of-shitty-devices or is used to >> enter parts of your network. > > I think that is what is called a straw-man argument. If a device can be > compromised in the way you suggest, then I am sure it will be replaced, > but it will be replaced because it needs to be, But how do *you* determine without doubts that it does *not* need to be replaced? (I do not claim that there's one good way to find out.) Ciao, Michael.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
