David Newall wrote: > On 02/01/18 02:22, Peter Moody wrote: >> I would prefer that: >> >> * commercial vendors patched the software they sold > > We all would prefer that, but I think you know that in reality, very few > customers have enough leverage to achieve that. I have a number of IBM > servers for which access to the remote console now requires old versions > of Java and old browsers. That's IBM. If they're not going to update > equipment, nobody is. Let's not pretend the world works differently. And how are you dealing with this particular case? Do you keep unpatched old browsers on all end-user systems? If yes, good luck... Ciao, Michael.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
