Re: Legacy option for key length?

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

 



On 02/01/18 03:29, Michael Ströder wrote:
How high is the risk that this unmaintained device is added to
yet-another-bot-net in the Internet-of-shitty-devices or is used to
enter parts of your network.

I think that is what is called a straw-man argument.  If a device can be compromised in the way you suggest, then I am sure it will be replaced, but it will be replaced because it needs to be, not because its management interface cannot be accessed via the latest openssh.  Disallowing use of openssh doesn't encourage people to throw away expensive gear, it encourages them to throw away new versions of openssh.

_______________________________________________
openssh-unix-dev mailing list
openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev




[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux