> > Hi: > Is there any reason why malloc/calloc/free are replaced with the ones > from libmmalloc? Well, even if there is one, it's not done properly. In fact, > as it is, calloc doesn't get linked in because nobody uses it. This causes > many library calls to segfault on Linux with libc6. Yes, there are reasons. > Anyway, you can add a dummy function to nntpcache.c to make sure that > it's linked in as a temporary fix. BTW, this is what causes expirations of any > kind to fail on Linux with libc6 (aka glibc2). This seems to be the correct permanent fix to me. Cheers, Julian.
