I think you should focus more on kernel development/discussion rather than saying thank you's. Etiquette wise it's perfectly okay. On 6/11/16, Anuz Pratap Singh Tomar <chambilkethakur@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't think greg or any senior kernel developer would like to get > personal mail, which are officially the list/community business. > Skipping thank you mails is really okay. you can always thank them in > advance is a good idea. > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Tobin Harding <me@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:03:57PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >> > >> > me@xxxxxxxx wrote: >> > >> > > LKML list etiquette question. When asking a [simple] question that >> > > receives an suitable answer is it correct etiquette to reply with a >> > > thank you email or is this just adding noise to the list? >> > >> > (Probably obvious, but you can always reply with a "thank you", >> > sent directly to the people who answered rather than to the list.) >> >> I had got the vibe that it was unacceptable to mail people directly and >> not cc >> the list. Is this response correct that there are times it is acceptable >> to >> exclude the list. GregKH has had to nudge me twice for doing this so I am >> very >> hesitant to write any emails that are not in the clear (cc'ing a list). >> >> Tobin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kernelnewbies mailing list >> Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies >> > > > > -- > Thank you > Warm Regards > Anuz > -- Manavendra Nath Manav _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
