This is exactly the same patch as you sent last time. And it's still wrong.
Nick, just out of curiosity: How old are you?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:26 PM, nick <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 14-09-10 12:49 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 23:53:50 -0400, nick said:
>>> Build Error. Fixed it. I need to really check my patches first :(.
>>
>> How many times have you done that now?
>>
>>> In addition, I want you to forget about and not reply to any patches
>>> you known I haven't build tested.
>>
>> No, it doesn't work like that. Each broken post counts against you.
>>
>>> + if (skb == NULL) {
>>> + skb_queue_purge(&priv->rtllib->skb_waitQ[TXCMD_QUEUE]);
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>
>> Like this one - it's *still* wrong. Because....
>>
>> From: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 21:12:56 -0400
>>
>> You reposted the same broken patch again.
>>
>> Please do the Linux kernel community a favor and seek gainful employment
>> in the food service industry or similar, where your skills will be more
>> appreciated.
>>
> Here is the correct patch.
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
>
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
