On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On September 8, 2014 11:08:46 PM EDT, nick <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>I am attaching a trial patch again , please let me known if there are >>any issues for me to fix. >>Nick > > Nick, I guess you know this list is a training ground for the main lists. As such the same rules are enforced when it comes to formatting. > > Patches as an attachment are simply not acceptable. You have to do them inline. I'm surprised people are even opening your attachments to look at them. My understanding is that the problem is not with attachments, but with using strange things like base64 for attachments. Nick has used plain text attachment which seem perfectly fine for me. Check this: http://www.tux.org/lkml/ "If I get a patch in an attachment (other than a "Text/PLAIN" type attachment with no mangling and that pretty much all mail readers and all tools will see as a normal body), I simply WILL NOT apply it unless I have strong reason to. I usually wont even bother looking at it, unless I expected something special from the sender. Really. Don't send patches as attachments. Linus" So plain text attachment seem to be acceptable... > > Greg > -- > Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > _______________________________________________ > Kernelnewbies mailing list > Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies -- Peter _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
