On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:16:19 -0400, nick said: > I am sending this in again fixed and working. Typos are still there, and zero explanation of how you verified "fixed and working", which given your track record of failing to even compile test your code is a *big* show-stopper. If you don't care about your patch enough to even bother fixing the typos, why should anybody else care? > I also looked at your complain about write_nic_byte and this seems to be > there if this succeeds. OK. This is C 101. How does write_nic_byte() get called if we just did the 'return false' and left both the do/while loop and the entire function in your patch?
Attachment:
pgpHQrkyreB5O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
