Hi.. On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 14:11, John Mahoney <jmahoney@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I agree. I was trying to show an example of the minimal amount of > work which must be accomplished by an interrupt handler with > interrupts disabled before the work can be passed to a process > context. I also think the threaded interrupts is a cool concept. > > I apologize if this made the discussion more confusing. I don't think it becomes more confusing...it was enriching the value of this discussion :) After all, it's there in the mainline kernel, so we should better know it :) -- regards, Mulyadi Santosa Freelance Linux trainer and consultant blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ