On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Mulyadi Santosa <mulyadi.santosa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 04:28, John Mahoney <jmahoney@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I had read an article[1] a while back about a push in the real-time >> kernel branch to make interrupt handlers scheduleable, but the article > > IIRC that's threaded interrupt handler...however, there is "basic > part" that must be done in atomic style. > I agree. I was trying to show an example of the minimal amount of work which must be accomplished by an interrupt handler with interrupts disabled before the work can be passed to a process context. I also think the threaded interrupts is a cool concept. I apologize if this made the discussion more confusing. -- John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
