Re: get_pid problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi...

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 16:10, Sumit Sharma <sumsha18@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for your inputs. You are righ that get_pid() just increments one atomic counter, so this should not be the culprit, but could you please let me know if tast_pid(current) might cause the process to become invisible?

Please don't do top posting...

About task_pid (you mean this right? not tast_pid(), I see nothing
suspicious there:
static inline struct pid *task_pid(struct task_struct *task)
{
return task->pids[PIDTYPE_PID].pid;
}

(quoted from http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.27.46/include/linux/sched.h#L1353)

-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux