Re: why use spin_lock_{irq, irqsave}()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/3/29 अनुज <anuj01@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi list
>
> Please anybody elaborate on this point : When we take any lock in
> kernel e.g. spin_lock() then preemption is automatically disabled by
> kernel. Then why to use spin_lock_{irq, irqsave}()? I am assuming even
> interrupt handler cant preempt the kernel when preemption is disabled
> by kernel.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Anuj Aggarwal
>
> .''`.
> : :Ⓐ :   # apt-get install hakuna-matata
> `. `'`
>   `-
>

Anuj,

spin_lock and all its variations disable "preemption" not "interrupt".
Kernel do change its context to interrupt handler when it receives
external event like timer.
Please read archives about the similar topic discussed here before.

-VInit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux