Re: interrupt dependencies.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

On 13:45 Mon 08 Feb     , Andrea Gasparini wrote:
> Hi, 
> Let's say I have two kind of interrupt: IntA e IntB
> After the former, I should do something, let's say "funcA()".
> and after the second I should do (guess what?) funcB().
> 
> My constraints are that funcB have to be called after the relative funcA, 
> and *not* viceversa, and funcA have to be called during IntA handlers just 
> for speeding up things.
> 
> Given that I can't say nothing about order of interrupts, how can I handle 
> the fact that funcB have to be called after funcA ? 
> ( I mean: I know that IntA will be raised before IntB, but that's doesn't 
> mean that the respective handlers will be called in this order... or not?)
> 
> Hope that was clear enough... 

Maybe somehow like this:

interruptA()
{
	funcA();

	int call = 0;
	lock a
	if (flag2 == 1) {
		call = 1;
		flag2 = 0;
	} else
		flag1 = 1
	unlock a

	if (call)
		funcB();
}

interruptB()
{
	int call = 0;
	lock a
	if (flag1 == 1) {
		flag1 = 0;
		call = 1;
	} else
		flag2 = 1;
	unlock a

	if (call)
		funcB();
}

	-Michi
-- 
programing a layer 3+4 network protocol for mesh networks
see http://michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux