Re: distribution kits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You wrote to "Roman Mashak" <mrv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:32:57 +0200:

??>> what benefits you yield using that or those distribution..
??>>
??>> I remember hard times trying to upgrade new kernels on a red hat
??>> 7.x-8.x, now I have to choose the new one, quite modern yet stable and
??>> well configurable.
SP> On the testing process of a new driver, usually you are not depended on
SP> the distribution.
SP> The reason is that you are developing something inside the kernel,
SP> so the only requirement is the  kernel itself.
Yes, it's always better to work with vanilla kernel and what I referred to is the easy and panless kernel upgrade (and corresponding user-land helpers, like modutils) if required for tests.

If you don't mind, what's your develop/test cycle?

SP> On the other hand, I try to avoid distros that use their own modified
SP> kernel, like fedora,
[skip]

Right, Fedora is mostly a test bed. And as far as I heard (but didn't try yet), Debian has a well-designed mechanisms/utilities allowing you to smoothly upgrade the system without troubles etc.

--
Roman Mashak


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ


[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux